WebP Method Settings Study

Study how WebP encoding method affects quality and file size. Tests method settings from 0 (fastest) to 6 (slowest/best) at representative quality levels to find the optimal method/quality tradeoff.

Dataset: div2k-valid (100 images) · 5600 measurements · Formats: WEBP

Tool Versions
ToolVersion
ssimulacra2available
butteraugliavailable
ffmpeg7.1.3-0+deb13u1
cjpeg2.1.5
cwebp1.5.0
avifenc1.3.0
cjxl0.11.2

SSIMULACRA2 vs BPP

↑ Back to top

BUTTERAUGLI vs BPP

↑ Back to top

PSNR vs BPP

↑ Back to top

SSIM vs BPP

↑ Back to top

SSIMULACRA2 vs Method

↑ Back to top

BUTTERAUGLI vs Method

↑ Back to top

PSNR vs Method

↑ Back to top

SSIM vs Method

↑ Back to top

BITS PER SSIMULACRA2 PER PIXEL vs Method

↑ Back to top

BITS PER BUTTERAUGLI PER PIXEL vs Method

↑ Back to top

BITS PER PSNR PER PIXEL vs Method

↑ Back to top

BITS PER SSIM PER PIXEL vs Method

↑ Back to top

BPP vs Method

↑ Back to top

ENCODING TIME PER PIXEL vs Method

↑ Back to top

Visual Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of encoding artifacts on the most representative image fragments, selected automatically from the dataset using Butteraugli spatial distortion analysis.

Anisotropic Variance Analysis

Identifies the image and fragment where the choice of encoding parameters has the greatest anisotropic impact on quality. One fragment is selected per target metric group and shared across all target values within that group for direct comparability.