Live 4-Header SnapEagerness Comparison
All four headers are active simultaneously! Scroll to see how different snapEagerness values behave in real-time.
๐ก How to test: Scroll at different speeds and directions. Watch how each header responds to your scrolling. The higher the snapEagerness value, the more "eager" the header is to snap into position.
๐ What to Observe While Scrolling
1. Natural Movement (0.0) - Green Header
This header moves exactly with your scroll speed, providing the most intuitive experience. Notice how it feels completely connected to your scrolling motion.
- Pros: Most natural and intuitive feel
- Cons: May occasionally show small gaps on very fast scrolling
- Best for: Content-focused sites, reading experiences
2. Balanced Default (1.0) - Blue Header
The default value provides a sweet spot between natural movement and gap prevention. It predicts one scroll step ahead for smoother transitions.
- Pros: Good balance of natural feel and reliability
- Cons: Very subtle snapping might be noticeable to sensitive users
- Best for: Most general-purpose applications
3. Eager Prevention (2.0) - Orange Header
More aggressive gap prevention that predicts two scroll steps ahead. Notice the more pronounced snapping behavior.
- Pros: Virtually eliminates visual gaps
- Cons: More noticeable artificial snapping
- Best for: Complex interfaces where gaps cause layout issues
4. Magnetic Effect (3.0) - Red Header
Creates an intentional "magnetic" attraction to the top edge. The snapping becomes a deliberate part of the design language.
- Pros: Completely predictable, no gaps, distinctive behavior
- Cons: Least natural movement
- Best for: Gaming interfaces, when snapping is desired as a feature
๐งช Try These Tests
Slow Scrolling: All headers should feel natural and smooth.
Fast Scrolling: Notice how higher values prevent gaps but feel less natural.
Direction Changes: Quickly reverse scroll direction and observe how each header responds.
Momentum Scrolling: On mobile/trackpad, try flick scrolling to see behavior during deceleration.
๐ฏ Making Your Choice
The right snapEagerness value depends on your specific use case:
Choose 0.0-1.0 when:
- Natural movement is your top priority
- Building content-focused or reading interfaces
- Users typically scroll at moderate speeds
- You want the least distracting behavior possible
Choose 1.5-2.5 when:
- You have complex header layouts that can't show gaps
- Building mobile-first experiences (touch scrolling is often faster)
- Visual consistency is more important than naturalness
- You have animations or transitions that need reliable positioning
Choose 3.0+ when:
- Snapping behavior aligns with your design language
- Building gaming or highly interactive interfaces
- You want the header behavior to feel intentional and distinctive
- Zero tolerance for any visual gaps or inconsistencies
๐ Implementation
Setting snapEagerness is simple:
// Natural movement
naturalStickyTop(element, { snapEagerness: 0.0 });
// Balanced default (same as omitting the parameter)
naturalStickyTop(element, { snapEagerness: 1.0 });
// Eager gap prevention
naturalStickyTop(element, { snapEagerness: 2.0 });
// Magnetic effect
naturalStickyTop(element, { snapEagerness: 3.0 });
Keep scrolling to continue testing all four behaviors simultaneously!
This direct comparison eliminates the guesswork - you can immediately see and feel the differences between each setting.